JG & Ors, R v

JG & Ors, R v

The trial judge made an error of principle or reached a conclusion not reasonably open to him. The circumstantial evidence, telephone traffic, and unexplained cash provided sufficient basis for a jury to infer conspiracy. The judge's ruling was quashed and the trial ordered to continue.

Parties
Appellant: Regina; Respondent: JG; Respondent: SF; Respondent: MKS; Respondent: JPGT; Respondent: RSST; Respondent: MN; Respondent: PJR
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
17 July 2014
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Ruling of No Case to Answer
Outcome
appeal allowed; ruling quashed; trial to continue against all defendants
Legal Topics
Conspiracy, Evidence, Appeal, Drug Offences

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Appellant

JG

Respondent

SF

Respondent

MKS

Respondent

JPGT

Respondent

RSST

Respondent

MN

Respondent

PJR

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Ruling of No Case to Answer

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge erred in ruling there was no case to answer for six defendants charged with conspiracy to supply heroin
  2. 2 Whether circumstantial evidence and telephone data provided sufficient basis for a jury to convict

Ratio Decidendi

The trial judge made an error of principle or reached a conclusion not reasonably open to him. The circumstantial evidence, telephone traffic, and unexplained cash provided sufficient basis for a jury to infer conspiracy. The judge's ruling was quashed and the trial ordered to continue.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed; ruling quashed; trial to continue against all defendants

Orders

  • The judge's decision is quashed.
  • The trial will continue against all defendants.