LG, R. v [2018] EWCA Crim 736 (27 March 2018)
No significant prejudice to the respondent was identified that could not be accommodated by the trial process; no unequivocal representation not to prosecute was made; the judge erred in conflating the two limbs of abuse of process and in granting a stay without proper basis.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] EWCA Crim 736
- Parties
- Applicant: Regina; Respondent: L G
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 March 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Stay of Proceedings
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Abuse of Process, Delay, Fair Trial, Stay of Proceedings, Causing Death by Careless Driving
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Applicant
L G
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Stay of Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the delay in prosecution and reconsideration of charging decision amounts to an abuse of process justifying a stay
- 2 Whether the respondent suffered prejudice such that a fair trial is no longer possible
- 3 Whether there was an unequivocal representation by the prosecution not to prosecute
Ratio Decidendi
No significant prejudice to the respondent was identified that could not be accommodated by the trial process; no unequivocal representation not to prosecute was made; the judge erred in conflating the two limbs of abuse of process and in granting a stay without proper basis.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- judge's stay ruling reversed
- proceedings for the offence charged to be resumed in the Crown Court
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment