R. v M & T
The trial judge's decision that there was insufficient evidence for a reasonable jury to convict Thompson and McIntosh was within the range of reasonable response, given the lack of evidence of prior knowledge or planning and the equivocal nature of the witness testimony. The Court of Appeal granted leave to appeal but dismissed the appeal, upholding the acquittal.
- Parties
- Applicant: Regina; Respondent: M & T
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 December 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Prosecution Application for Leave to Appeal Against a Terminating Ruling Under S 58 Criminal Justice Act 2003
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Terminating Ruling, Joint Enterprise, Murder, Leave to Appeal, Acquittal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Applicant
M & T
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Prosecution Application for Leave to Appeal Against a Terminating Ruling Under S 58 Criminal Justice Act 2003
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there was sufficient evidence for a reasonable jury to convict Thompson and McIntosh as secondary parties to murder
- 2 Whether the trial judge's terminating ruling was outwith the range of reasonable response
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge's decision that there was insufficient evidence for a reasonable jury to convict Thompson and McIntosh was within the range of reasonable response, given the lack of evidence of prior knowledge or planning and the equivocal nature of the witness testimony. The Court of Appeal granted leave to appeal but dismissed the appeal, upholding the acquittal.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- order for acquittal of Thompson and McIntosh
- order restricting reporting of the appeal until trial conclusion
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment