Panesar, R. v
The judge erred by failing to apply statutory assumptions to the equity in the respondent's home after finding that tainted funds were used to pay off the mortgage. The entire equity should be included in the benefit figure for confiscation, as the legislative policy is to deprive criminals of proceeds, and there was no serious risk of injustice in doing so.
- Parties
- Applicant: Regina; Respondent: Parvinder Singh Panesar
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 July 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Confiscation Order
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Confiscation Order, Criminal Lifestyle, Benefit From Criminal Conduct, Statutory Assumptions, Proportionality
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Applicant
Parvinder Singh Panesar
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Confiscation Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent's equity in his home should be included in the benefit figure for confiscation under POCA 2002
- 2 Whether the judge erred in excluding certain assets from the benefit calculation
- 3 Application of statutory assumptions under section 10 POCA 2002
Ratio Decidendi
The judge erred by failing to apply statutory assumptions to the equity in the respondent's home after finding that tainted funds were used to pay off the mortgage. The entire equity should be included in the benefit figure for confiscation, as the legislative policy is to deprive criminals of proceeds, and there was no serious risk of injustice in doing so.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Benefit figure substituted at £174,087
- Available amount set at £174,087
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment