T, R. v
The combination of the circumstances of the offence, the offender's history of aggression and violence, and his behaviour in custody established that he posed a significant risk of serious harm to the public. A determinate sentence would not provide adequate protection, making an extended sentence necessary under section 226B of the Criminal Justice Act 2003.
- Parties
- Appellant: Regina; Respondent: T
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 November 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence; Reference by Solicitor General
- Outcome
- sentence quashed and substituted
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Dangerousness Provisions, Wounding With Intent, Youth Offenders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Appellant
T
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence; Reference by Solicitor General
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive or unduly lenient
- 2 Whether the dangerousness provisions under section 226B of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 should apply to a youth offender convicted of wounding with intent
Ratio Decidendi
The combination of the circumstances of the offence, the offender's history of aggression and violence, and his behaviour in custody established that he posed a significant risk of serious harm to the public. A determinate sentence would not provide adequate protection, making an extended sentence necessary under section 226B of the Criminal Justice Act 2003.
Court Disposition
sentence quashed and substituted
Orders
- Sentence of five years' detention quashed for wounding with intent
- Substituted with an extended sentence of eight years (five years' custody, three years' extension) under section 226B of the Criminal Justice Act 2003
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment