Eagle Star Insurance Company Ltd. v Cresswell & Ors
The Claims Co-operation Clause (sub-paragraph (b)) operates as an exclusion of liability for any claim not controlled by reinsurers; compliance is a condition precedent to liability. The 'follow the settlements' clause is qualified by typed provisions requiring reinsurers' consent and control. Reinsurers are not bound to indemnify Eagle Star for settlements not controlled or consented to by them unless waiver, estoppel, or unreasonable conduct is proven.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Eagle Star Insurance Company Limited; Defendants/appellants: J N Cresswell & Others
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 May 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Queen’s Bench Division (commercial Court), Trial of Preliminary Issues
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; preliminary issues answered in favour of reinsurers, subject to qualification.
- Legal Topics
- Reinsurance, Claims Co Operation Clause, Claims Control Clause, Follow the Settlements, Condition Precedent, Policy Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Eagle Star Insurance Company Limited
Claimant/respondent
J N Cresswell & Others
Defendants/appellants
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Queen’s Bench Division (commercial Court), Trial of Preliminary Issues
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether compliance with sub-paragraph (b) of the Claims Co-operation Clause is a condition precedent to liability under the reinsurance policy
- 2 Whether reinsurers are bound to indemnify Eagle Star pursuant to the 'follow the settlements' clause despite breach of sub-paragraph (b)
Ratio Decidendi
The Claims Co-operation Clause (sub-paragraph (b)) operates as an exclusion of liability for any claim not controlled by reinsurers; compliance is a condition precedent to liability. The 'follow the settlements' clause is qualified by typed provisions requiring reinsurers' consent and control. Reinsurers are not bound to indemnify Eagle Star for settlements not controlled or consented to by them unless waiver, estoppel, or unreasonable conduct is proven.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; preliminary issues answered in favour of reinsurers, subject to qualification.
Orders
- Set aside judge’s answers to preliminary issues 3 and 4.
- Reinsurers not liable to indemnify Eagle Star for settlement not controlled by them unless waiver, estoppel, or unreasonable conduct is established.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment