Dhillon & Anor v Sandhu [2014] EWHC 3229 (Ch) (23 July 2014)
The application to adduce fresh evidence fails because the evidence could, with reasonable diligence, have been obtained for use at the hearing before the Master; admission would not have had an important influence on the result; and the evidence is incomplete and raises further questions.
- Citation
- [2014] EWHC 3229 (Ch)
- Parties
- Defendant/appellant: Jaswant Singh Dhillon; Defendant/appellant: Maidie Mohinder Kaur Dhillon; Claimant/respondent: Bagga Singh Sandhu
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 July 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Rolled Up Hearing: Permission to Appeal and Substantive Appeal
- Outcome
- application to adduce fresh evidence dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Relief From Sanctions, Admission of Fresh Evidence, Partnership Dispute, Appeals Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jaswant Singh Dhillon
Defendant/appellant
Maidie Mohinder Kaur Dhillon
Defendant/appellant
Bagga Singh Sandhu
Claimant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Rolled Up Hearing: Permission to Appeal and Substantive Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether appellants should be permitted to adduce fresh evidence on appeal
- 2 Whether relief from sanctions should be granted for failure to comply with court orders
Ratio Decidendi
The application to adduce fresh evidence fails because the evidence could, with reasonable diligence, have been obtained for use at the hearing before the Master; admission would not have had an important influence on the result; and the evidence is incomplete and raises further questions.
Court Disposition
application to adduce fresh evidence dismissed
Orders
- Application to adduce fresh evidence refused
- No relief from sanctions granted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment