Edmunds v Newell & Anor [2020] EW Misc 7 (CC) (02 July 2020)

Edmunds v Newell & Anor [2020] EW Misc 7 (CC) (02 July 2020)

Relief from sanctions was refused due to serious and significant breaches, ongoing inefficiency, lack of clarity in the sums claimed, repeated non-compliance, and unjustifiable delay. The claim was struck out as a proportionate response under CPR 3.4(1) and the inherent jurisdiction of the court.

Parties
Claimant: Marguerite Anne Edmunds; First Defendant: Bryan John Newell; Second Defendant: Capital Homes Ltd
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
02 July 2020
Procedural Posture
Civil / Application for Relief From Sanctions; Strike Out Decision
Outcome
claim struck out; counterclaim to proceed
Legal Topics
Relief From Sanctions, Service Charges, Breach of Covenant, Case Management, Leasehold Disputes

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Marguerite Anne Edmunds

Claimant

Bryan John Newell

First Defendant

Capital Homes Ltd

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Application for Relief From Sanctions; Strike Out Decision

  1. 1 Whether relief from sanctions should be granted for failure to comply with court orders
  2. 2 Whether the claim should be struck out for inefficiency and non-compliance
  3. 3 Whether sums claimed for service charges and damages are recoverable

Ratio Decidendi

Relief from sanctions was refused due to serious and significant breaches, ongoing inefficiency, lack of clarity in the sums claimed, repeated non-compliance, and unjustifiable delay. The claim was struck out as a proportionate response under CPR 3.4(1) and the inherent jurisdiction of the court.

Court Disposition

claim struck out; counterclaim to proceed

Orders

  • Relief from sanctions refused
  • Claim struck out