Edmunds v Newell & Anor [2020] EW Misc 7 (CC) (02 July 2020)
Relief from sanctions was refused due to serious and significant breaches, ongoing inefficiency, lack of clarity in the sums claimed, repeated non-compliance, and unjustifiable delay. The claim was struck out as a proportionate response under CPR 3.4(1) and the inherent jurisdiction of the court.
- Parties
- Claimant: Marguerite Anne Edmunds; First Defendant: Bryan John Newell; Second Defendant: Capital Homes Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 July 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Application for Relief From Sanctions; Strike Out Decision
- Outcome
- claim struck out; counterclaim to proceed
- Legal Topics
- Relief From Sanctions, Service Charges, Breach of Covenant, Case Management, Leasehold Disputes
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Marguerite Anne Edmunds
Claimant
Bryan John Newell
First Defendant
Capital Homes Ltd
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Application for Relief From Sanctions; Strike Out Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether relief from sanctions should be granted for failure to comply with court orders
- 2 Whether the claim should be struck out for inefficiency and non-compliance
- 3 Whether sums claimed for service charges and damages are recoverable
Ratio Decidendi
Relief from sanctions was refused due to serious and significant breaches, ongoing inefficiency, lack of clarity in the sums claimed, repeated non-compliance, and unjustifiable delay. The claim was struck out as a proportionate response under CPR 3.4(1) and the inherent jurisdiction of the court.
Court Disposition
claim struck out; counterclaim to proceed
Orders
- Relief from sanctions refused
- Claim struck out
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment