McKay v Titley
There was no real prospect of success on appeal as the judge exercised proper discretion in refusing an adjournment, Mrs McKay lacked standing to seek removal of the trustee or disclosure under the relevant insolvency rules, and the trustee had already obtained his release, rendering the application academic.
- Parties
- Applicant/appellant: Christine McKay; Respondent/defendant: John Titley (Trustee in Bankruptcy of Christine McKay)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 June 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal
- Outcome
- application for permission to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Removal of Trustee in Bankruptcy, Adjournment, Standing, Disclosure of Third Party Funding, Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Christine McKay
Applicant/appellant
John Titley (Trustee in Bankruptcy of Christine McKay)
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the judge erred in refusing an adjournment and not hearing the case in a more convenient location
- 2 Whether the application should have been dismissed due to the respondent's non-attendance
- 3 Whether Mrs McKay had standing to seek removal of the trustee and disclosure of third party funding
Ratio Decidendi
There was no real prospect of success on appeal as the judge exercised proper discretion in refusing an adjournment, Mrs McKay lacked standing to seek removal of the trustee or disclosure under the relevant insolvency rules, and the trustee had already obtained his release, rendering the application academic.
Court Disposition
application for permission to appeal refused
Orders
- Application refused
- Copy of transcript to be sent to Mrs McKay at public expense
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment