Procter v Procter & Ors

Procter v Procter & Ors

It is undesirable for the First Defendant to remain sole legal trustee due to justified concerns about conflict and self-serving conduct; vesting legal title in the Fourth Defendant alone as independent trustee is necessary to safeguard beneficiaries' interests.

Parties
Claimant: Procter; First Defendant: Procter; Second Defendant: Procter; Fourth Defendant: Womble Bond Dickinson Trust Corporation Limited; Third Defendant: Mr Knowles
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 October 2024
Procedural Posture
Trusts and Probate / Judgment on Amended Application for Removal and Appointment of Trustees
Outcome
Application granted; trustees removed and new trustee appointed; vesting order made.
Legal Topics
Removal of Trustees, Appointment of Trustees, Vesting Orders, Beneficial Ownership, Conflict of Interest

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Procter

Claimant

Procter

First Defendant

Procter

Second Defendant

Womble Bond Dickinson Trust Corporation Limited

Fourth Defendant

Mr Knowles

Third Defendant

Procedural Posture

Trusts and Probate / Judgment on Amended Application for Removal and Appointment of Trustees

  1. 1 Whether trustees should be removed and replaced with an independent trustee
  2. 2 Whether legal title to land should be vested in the Fourth Defendant alone
  3. 3 Whether current trustees' conduct justifies removal

Ratio Decidendi

It is undesirable for the First Defendant to remain sole legal trustee due to justified concerns about conflict and self-serving conduct; vesting legal title in the Fourth Defendant alone as independent trustee is necessary to safeguard beneficiaries' interests.

Court Disposition

Application granted; trustees removed and new trustee appointed; vesting order made.

Orders

  • Removal of existing trustees of legal title
  • Appointment of Fourth Defendant as sole trustee