Coles, Re [2004] EWLands LP_02_2003 (16 February 2004)
The Tribunal held that the application to modify the restrictive covenant would be granted upon completion of a landscaping scheme, and that compensation would be awarded to the objectors as money was deemed adequate for any loss or disadvantage resulting from the modification.
- Citation
- [2004] EWLands LP_02_2003
- Parties
- Claimant: Barry William Arthur Coles; Claimant: Jillian Lesley Coles
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 February 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Modify Restrictive Covenant / Interim Decision
- Outcome
- application granted subject to condition
- Legal Topics
- Restrictive Covenants, Modification of Covenants, Compensation for Loss or Disadvantage
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Barry William Arthur Coles
Claimant
Jillian Lesley Coles
Claimant
Procedural Posture
Application to Modify Restrictive Covenant / Interim Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the restrictive covenant limiting development to two detached bungalows not exceeding one storey should be modified to permit retention and completion of a first floor extension
- 2 Whether the restriction secures practical benefits of substantial value or advantage
- 3 Whether money will be adequate compensation for any loss or disadvantage
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal held that the application to modify the restrictive covenant would be granted upon completion of a landscaping scheme, and that compensation would be awarded to the objectors as money was deemed adequate for any loss or disadvantage resulting from the modification.
Court Disposition
application granted subject to condition
Orders
- Modification of the restrictive covenant to permit retention and completion of the first floor extension upon completion of landscaping scheme
- Compensation of £10,000 awarded to the first and second objectors
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment