Revenue & Customs Prosecution Office v Taylor
The Magistrates’ Court has jurisdiction under s.77(2) Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980 to postpone the issue of a warrant of commitment for a default term imposed by the Crown Court in respect of a confiscation order under the Drug Trafficking Offences Act 1986 until after the expiry of a custodial sentence for a different offence.
- Parties
- Appellant: Revenue and Customs Prosecution Office; Respondent: George Taylor
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 31 March 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Postponement of Warrant of Commitment, Enforcement of Confiscation Orders, Jurisdiction of Magistrates' Court
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Revenue and Customs Prosecution Office
Appellant
George Taylor
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Magistrates’ Court has power under s.77(2) Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980 to postpone the issue of a warrant of commitment in respect of a default term of imprisonment imposed by the Crown Court when making a confiscation order under the Drug Trafficking Offences Act 1986 until after the expiry of a custodial sentence for a different offence
Ratio Decidendi
The Magistrates’ Court has jurisdiction under s.77(2) Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980 to postpone the issue of a warrant of commitment for a default term imposed by the Crown Court in respect of a confiscation order under the Drug Trafficking Offences Act 1986 until after the expiry of a custodial sentence for a different offence.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- District Judge had power under s.77(2) Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980 to postpone the issue of a warrant of commitment as sought.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment