Yousif Sesay & Ors v R
Where a life sentence is imposed, the sentencing judge must announce the minimum term as a specific period after deducting the precise number of remand days, which must also be stated in open court. Administrative correction of minimum terms is not permitted after sentencing; any error must be corrected by appeal if the statutory period has expired. Failure to specify remand days in court renders the sentence defective to that extent and requires appellate correction, even if the practical effect is negligible.
- Parties
- First Appellant: Yousif Sesay; Second Appellant: Laurence Griffiths; Third Appellant: Keal Richards; Fourth Appellant: Carl James Silcox; Respondent: Rex
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 November 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Applications and Renewed Applications for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeals allowed in part; minimum terms varied to specify remand days. Other grounds refused.
- Legal Topics
- Life Sentences, Minimum Term Calculation, Remand Credit, Appeal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Yousif Sesay
First Appellant
Laurence Griffiths
Second Appellant
Keal Richards
Third Appellant
Carl James Silcox
Fourth Appellant
Rex
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Applications and Renewed Applications for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 How should periods of remand in custody be credited when a life sentence is imposed?
- 2 What is the proper procedure for announcing minimum terms and remand days in life sentences?
- 3 Can administrative correction be made to minimum terms after sentencing?
Ratio Decidendi
Where a life sentence is imposed, the sentencing judge must announce the minimum term as a specific period after deducting the precise number of remand days, which must also be stated in open court. Administrative correction of minimum terms is not permitted after sentencing; any error must be corrected by appeal if the statutory period has expired. Failure to specify remand days in court renders the sentence defective to that extent and requires appellate correction, even if the practical effect is negligible.
Court Disposition
Appeals allowed in part; minimum terms varied to specify remand days. Other grounds refused.
Orders
- Minimum term for Yousif Sesay set at 21 years 64 days.
- Minimum term for Laurence Griffiths set at 7 years 60 days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment