Umut Alpergin & Anor v R [2024] EWCA Crim 313 (27 March 2024)
The Court found that Alex Findlay's role was significant but not leading, warranting a lower culpability categorisation (2B) and a reduced custodial term, but upheld the need for an extended licence due to ongoing risk. Umut Alpergin's harm categorisation was reduced to 3B, reflecting his more limited role and absence of elevated risk, justifying a lower sentence.
- Citation
- [2024] EWCA Crim 313
- Parties
- First Appellant: Umut Alpergin; Second Appellant: Alex Findlay; Respondent: Rex
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 March 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal Against Sentence / Court of Appeal (criminal Division) Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeals allowed in part; sentences varied
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Firearms Offences, Drug Offences, Serious Crime Prevention Orders, Extended Determinate Sentences
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Umut Alpergin
First Appellant
Alex Findlay
Second Appellant
Rex
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal Against Sentence / Court of Appeal (criminal Division) Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentencing judge mis-categorised the seriousness and role of the appellants in firearms and drug offences
- 2 Whether the extended licence period for Alex Findlay was justified
- 3 Whether the harm categorisation for both appellants was correct under sentencing guidelines
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that Alex Findlay's role was significant but not leading, warranting a lower culpability categorisation (2B) and a reduced custodial term, but upheld the need for an extended licence due to ongoing risk. Umut Alpergin's harm categorisation was reduced to 3B, reflecting his more limited role and absence of elevated risk, justifying a lower sentence.
Court Disposition
Appeals allowed in part; sentences varied
Orders
- For Alex Findlay: Sentences on counts 1 and 2 of indictment 20217180 quashed and substituted with extended determinate sentences of 19 years (15 years custody, 4 years extended licence) concurrent; other concurrent sentences unaffected.
- For Umut Alpergin: Sentence of 9 years on count 12 quashed and substituted with 7 years imprisonment; concurrent sentence of 4 years on count 15 stands.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment