Barton, R. v [2023] EWCA Crim 531 (17 May 2023)
Leave to appeal conviction and sentence is refused as there are no arguable grounds that the conviction was unsafe or the sentence manifestly excessive; the 2015 SHPO and its amendments are quashed as unlawful due to lack of statutory power to impose them for breach of a SOPO.
- Citation
- [2023] EWCA Crim 531
- Parties
- Applicant/appellant: Dean Barton; Respondent: Rex
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 May 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal conviction and sentence refused; 2015 SHPO and amendments quashed.
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Offences, Appeal Against Conviction, Appeal Against Sentence, Sexual Harm Prevention Order (shpo), Sexual Offences Prevention Order (sopo), Extension of Time
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dean Barton
Applicant/appellant
Rex
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave to appeal conviction and sentence should be granted
- 2 Lawfulness of the 2015 Sexual Harm Prevention Order (SHPO) and subsequent amendments
- 3 Extension of time for appeal
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal conviction and sentence is refused as there are no arguable grounds that the conviction was unsafe or the sentence manifestly excessive; the 2015 SHPO and its amendments are quashed as unlawful due to lack of statutory power to impose them for breach of a SOPO.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal conviction and sentence refused; 2015 SHPO and amendments quashed.
Orders
- Quash the 2015 SHPO, the 2016 Amended SHPO, and the 2021 Amended SHPO.
- Urge parties to seek variation of SOPO in Crown Court to reflect Family Court order regarding contact with applicant's child.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment