ALD, R. v [2023] EWCA Crim 967 (27 July 2023)
The trial judge erred in law by relying on extraneous matters, including her own experience and the respondent's self-serving statement, in granting a terminating ruling. The assessment of the complainant's evidence and credibility was for the jury, not the judge. The ruling was unreasonable and must be reversed.
- Citation
- [2023] EWCA Crim 967
- Parties
- Applicant: Rex; Respondent: ALD
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 July 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Terminating Ruling; Application for Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; terminating ruling reversed; fresh trial ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Rape, Submission of No Case to Answer, Judicial Error, Jury Function, Credibility Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Applicant
ALD
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Terminating Ruling; Application for Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge erred in granting a terminating ruling on the basis of the complainant's evidence being 'out of all reason'
- 2 Whether the judge improperly relied on extraneous matters and her own experience in assessing credibility
- 3 Whether the judge improperly took into account a self-serving statement by the respondent in a submission of no case to answer
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge erred in law by relying on extraneous matters, including her own experience and the respondent's self-serving statement, in granting a terminating ruling. The assessment of the complainant's evidence and credibility was for the jury, not the judge. The ruling was unreasonable and must be reversed.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; terminating ruling reversed; fresh trial ordered.
Orders
- Leave to appeal granted.
- Terminating ruling reversed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment