R v ALD
The trial judge erred in law by relying on extraneous matters, including her own experience and the respondent’s self-serving statement, in granting a terminating ruling of no case to answer. The proper assessment of the evidence, including credibility, was for the jury. The ruling was unreasonable and must be reversed.
- Parties
- Applicant: Rex; Respondent: ALD
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 June 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Application for Leave to Appeal and Substantive Appeal Against Terminating Ruling
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; terminating ruling reversed; new trial ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Rape, No Case to Answer Submission, Judicial Error, Jury Function, Sexual Offences Reporting Restrictions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Applicant
ALD
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Application for Leave to Appeal and Substantive Appeal Against Terminating Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge erred in granting a terminating ruling of no case to answer in a rape trial
- 2 Whether the judge improperly relied on extraneous matters and her own experience rather than the evidence
- 3 Whether the judge improperly assessed the credibility of the complainant
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge erred in law by relying on extraneous matters, including her own experience and the respondent’s self-serving statement, in granting a terminating ruling of no case to answer. The proper assessment of the evidence, including credibility, was for the jury. The ruling was unreasonable and must be reversed.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; terminating ruling reversed; new trial ordered.
Orders
- Leave to appeal granted
- Terminating ruling set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment