R v Arturas Jusas

R v Arturas Jusas

The confiscation order must be reduced by £14,500 to reflect the legitimate third party interest in seized cash, as established by evidence from Ms Li and accepted by the National Crime Agency.

Parties
Applicant: Rex; Respondent: Arturas Jusas
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
21 January 2026
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Confiscation Order
Outcome
appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Confiscation Order, Third Party Interests, Appeal Procedure
Criminal Law Proceeds of Crime Confiscation Order Third Party Interests Appeal Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Applicant

Arturas Jusas

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Confiscation Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the confiscation order should be reduced to reflect third party interests in seized cash
  2. 2 Whether fresh evidence regarding ownership of seized funds should be admitted

Ratio Decidendi

The confiscation order must be reduced by £14,500 to reflect the legitimate third party interest in seized cash, as established by evidence from Ms Li and accepted by the National Crime Agency.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed

Orders

  • confiscation order varied to certify benefit figure as £3,602,910.17 and amount to pay as £639,882.47