R v BLC
The trial judge's interpretation of section 1 of the Malicious Communications Act 1988 was wrong in law. Posting a message online can amount to sending a message to another person if it is intended that the contents will be communicated to the subject for the purpose of causing distress or anxiety. The prosecution complied with the statutory requirements for appeal, and the trial may proceed.
- Parties
- Applicant: Rex; Respondent: B L C
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 August 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Pre Trial Ruling
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Malicious Communications, Prosecution Appeals, Reporting Restrictions, Abuse of Process
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Applicant
B L C
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Pre Trial Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether posting a message online can constitute 'sending to another person' under section 1 of the Malicious Communications Act 1988
- 2 Whether the trial judge's interpretation of section 1 was correct
- 3 Whether the prosecution complied with the statutory requirements for appeal under section 58 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge's interpretation of section 1 of the Malicious Communications Act 1988 was wrong in law. Posting a message online can amount to sending a message to another person if it is intended that the contents will be communicated to the subject for the purpose of causing distress or anxiety. The prosecution complied with the statutory requirements for appeal, and the trial may proceed.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Leave to appeal granted
- Judge's order reversed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment