R v BLC

R v BLC

The trial judge's interpretation of section 1 of the Malicious Communications Act 1988 was wrong in law. Posting a message online can amount to sending a message to another person if it is intended that the contents will be communicated to the subject for the purpose of causing distress or anxiety. The prosecution complied with the statutory requirements for appeal, and the trial may proceed.

Parties
Applicant: Rex; Respondent: B L C
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
10 August 2024
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Pre Trial Ruling
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Malicious Communications, Prosecution Appeals, Reporting Restrictions, Abuse of Process

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Applicant

B L C

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Pre Trial Ruling

  1. 1 Whether posting a message online can constitute 'sending to another person' under section 1 of the Malicious Communications Act 1988
  2. 2 Whether the trial judge's interpretation of section 1 was correct
  3. 3 Whether the prosecution complied with the statutory requirements for appeal under section 58 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003

Ratio Decidendi

The trial judge's interpretation of section 1 of the Malicious Communications Act 1988 was wrong in law. Posting a message online can amount to sending a message to another person if it is intended that the contents will be communicated to the subject for the purpose of causing distress or anxiety. The prosecution complied with the statutory requirements for appeal, and the trial may proceed.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Leave to appeal granted
  • Judge's order reversed