R v Danyal Haroon

R v Danyal Haroon

The sentencing judge was entitled to categorise the offence as category B (high culpability) given the facts, to find the applicant dangerous, and to impose an extended determinate sentence. The judge gave appropriate weight to mitigating factors, including age, PTSD, and positive steps, and the sentence was not manifestly excessive.

Parties
Applicant: Rex; Respondent: Danyal Haroon
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
13 May 2025
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
Application for leave to appeal against sentence refused
Legal Topics
Manslaughter, Sentencing, Dangerous Offender, Extended Sentence, Mitigation, Youth Offender

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Applicant

Danyal Haroon

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence

  1. 1 Whether the sentencing judge erred in categorising the offence as category B (high culpability) under the Manslaughter Guidelines
  2. 2 Whether the imposition of an extended determinate sentence was justified
  3. 3 Whether sufficient weight was given to mitigating factors including age, PTSD, remorse, and positive steps taken by the applicant

Ratio Decidendi

The sentencing judge was entitled to categorise the offence as category B (high culpability) given the facts, to find the applicant dangerous, and to impose an extended determinate sentence. The judge gave appropriate weight to mitigating factors, including age, PTSD, and positive steps, and the sentence was not manifestly excessive.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal against sentence refused