Johnson, R. v [2026] EWCA Crim 550 (16 April 2026)
Although the sentencing judge erred in suggesting the victim's wishes could determine the sentence, the sentence imposed was not unduly lenient because the custodial threshold was crossed but effectively served by time in custody, and the sentence remained within the reasonable range for the offences and circumstances.
- Citation
- [2026] EWCA Crim 550
- Parties
- Applicant: Rex; Respondent: Martyn Johnson
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 April 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Attorney General's Reference (criminal) / Appeal Against Sentence Under Section 36 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988
- Outcome
- Reference granted; appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Stalking, Sentencing, Domestic Abuse, Attorney General's Reference, Unduly Lenient Sentence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Applicant
Martyn Johnson
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Attorney General's Reference (criminal) / Appeal Against Sentence Under Section 36 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed for stalking involving serious alarm or distress was unduly lenient
- 2 Whether the sentencing judge erred by giving determinative weight to the victim's personal statement and time served in custody
Ratio Decidendi
Although the sentencing judge erred in suggesting the victim's wishes could determine the sentence, the sentence imposed was not unduly lenient because the custodial threshold was crossed but effectively served by time in custody, and the sentence remained within the reasonable range for the offences and circumstances.
Court Disposition
Reference granted; appeal dismissed
Orders
- Leave for the Reference granted to clarify sentencing principles in domestic abuse cases.
- Reference dismissed; original sentence stands.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment