Latham, R. v [2026] EWCA Crim 269 (20 February 2026)
The Court held that while some reductions for personal mitigation appeared generous, the overall sentence was carefully crafted, proportionate, and not unduly lenient. The judge's approach to categorisation, mitigation, and totality was within reasonable bounds, and the aggregate sentence reflected the seriousness...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2026] EWCA Crim 269
- Parties
- Applicant: Rex; Respondent: Stuart Latham
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 February 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Reference by Attorney General Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988
- Outcome
- Application for leave granted; no intervention to increase sentence.
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Sexual Offences, Child Protection, Blackmail, Dangerousness, Mitigation, Totality Principle
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Applicant
Stuart Latham
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Reference by Attorney General Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed was unduly lenient
- 2 Appropriate categorisation and mitigation for multiple sexual offences against children
- 3 Application of totality principle in sentencing
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that while some reductions for personal mitigation appeared generous, the overall sentence was carefully crafted, proportionate, and not unduly lenient. The judge's approach to categorisation, mitigation, and totality was within reasonable bounds, and the aggregate sentence reflected the seriousness of the offending, including an exceptional extension period for public protection.
Court Disposition
Application for leave granted; no intervention to increase sentence.
Orders
- Leave to refer granted under s.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988
- No increase to sentence; original sentence stands
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment