R v Syed Minhaz Ahmed
The statutory time limit for applying to refer a point of law to the Supreme Court under section 36(5) Criminal Justice Act 1988 is strict and cannot be extended; the application was out of time and invalid. No point of law of general public importance arises regarding the sentencing guidelines in this case.
- Parties
- Applicant: Rex; Respondent: Syed Minhaz Ahmed
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 November 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Reference / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Refer Point of Law to Supreme Court
- Outcome
- Application refused
- Legal Topics
- Unduly Lenient Sentences, Time Limits, Sentencing Guidelines, Leave to Appeal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Applicant
Syed Minhaz Ahmed
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Reference / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Refer Point of Law to Supreme Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Court of Appeal has power to extend the statutory time limit for applications to refer a point of law to the Supreme Court under section 36(5) Criminal Justice Act 1988
- 2 Whether a point of law of general public importance arises regarding the application of sentencing guidelines
Ratio Decidendi
The statutory time limit for applying to refer a point of law to the Supreme Court under section 36(5) Criminal Justice Act 1988 is strict and cannot be extended; the application was out of time and invalid. No point of law of general public importance arises regarding the sentencing guidelines in this case.
Court Disposition
Application refused
Orders
- Application for extension of time is refused
- No certification of point of law of general public importance
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment