R v Tan Cong Nguyen
A greater proportion of the electronic datum should be allowed in the PPE count because the prosecution relied on the holistic use of the mobile phone, including images and app usage, to disprove the modern slavery defence. However, not all electronic datum should be included; only those categories actually relied upon by the prosecution. Given the 10,000 page cap, the appropriate PPE count is 10,131 pages.
- Parties
- Appellant: REX; Respondent: Tan Cong Nguyen
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 March 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Costs Appeal (criminal Legal Aid) / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Litigator's Graduated Fees Scheme, Pages of Prosecution Evidence, Criminal Legal Aid (remuneration) Regulations 2013, Electronic Evidence, Costs Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
REX
Appellant
Tan Cong Nguyen
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Costs Appeal (criminal Legal Aid) / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the total pages of prosecution evidence (PPE) should be 10,000 as claimed or 882 as allowed
- 2 What categories of electronic evidence should be included in the PPE count under the 2013 Regulations
Ratio Decidendi
A greater proportion of the electronic datum should be allowed in the PPE count because the prosecution relied on the holistic use of the mobile phone, including images and app usage, to disprove the modern slavery defence. However, not all electronic datum should be included; only those categories actually relied upon by the prosecution. Given the 10,000 page cap, the appropriate PPE count is 10,131 pages.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- The appropriate additional payment, including the £100 paid on appeal, plus costs of £750 (+ any VAT payable), should be made to the Appellants.
- PPE count set at 10,131 pages.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment