Iluminesia Limited (t/a Alterego Facades) v RFL Facades Limited
A binding contract was formed between AlterEgo and RFL incorporating adjudication provisions; the Notice of Adjudication was valid; the adjudicator acted within jurisdiction and did not breach natural justice; and the principle of approbation and reprobation does not prevent enforcement. RFL has no real prospect of successfully defending the claim at trial.
- Parties
- Claimant: Iluminesia Limited (t/a AlterEgo Facades); Defendant: RFL Facades Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Summary Judgment Application in Adjudication Enforcement Proceedings / Judgment on Summary Judgment Application
- Outcome
- Summary judgment granted in favour of AlterEgo.
- Legal Topics
- Adjudication Enforcement, Contract Formation, Jurisdiction, Natural Justice, Summary Judgment, Approbation and Reprobation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Iluminesia Limited (t/a AlterEgo Facades)
Claimant
RFL Facades Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Summary Judgment Application in Adjudication Enforcement Proceedings / Judgment on Summary Judgment Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a contract was formed between AlterEgo and RFL incorporating adjudication provisions
- 2 Whether the adjudicator had jurisdiction to decide the dispute
- 3 Whether the Notice of Intention to Refer to Adjudication was valid
Ratio Decidendi
A binding contract was formed between AlterEgo and RFL incorporating adjudication provisions; the Notice of Adjudication was valid; the adjudicator acted within jurisdiction and did not breach natural justice; and the principle of approbation and reprobation does not prevent enforcement. RFL has no real prospect of successfully defending the claim at trial.
Court Disposition
Summary judgment granted in favour of AlterEgo.
Orders
- AlterEgo awarded summary judgment for £776,920.32 plus applicable VAT, interest, and 80% of the adjudicator’s fee.
- Further hearing to address consequential matters, permission to appeal, and interrelationship with the Part 8 claim.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment