RH & Anor v MM & Ors [2025] EWFC 288 (22 September 2025)
S is currently stateless as she has not acquired Indian citizenship by descent and is not a British citizen. The adoption application is a domestic adoption, not one with a foreign element, as S has always resided in the UK and was not brought into or taken out of the jurisdiction for adoption. There is no legal...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] EWFC 288
- Parties
- Applicant: RH; Applicant: TH; First Respondent: MM; Second Respondent: A City Council; Third Respondent: S (by her Children's Guardian); Fourth Respondent: Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 September 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Adoption Application / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Adoption order granted
- Legal Topics
- Adoption of Stateless Child, Nationality Determination, Consular Notification, International Adoption Conventions, Parental Consent in Adoption
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
RH
Applicant
TH
Applicant
MM
First Respondent
A City Council
Second Respondent
S (by her Children's Guardian)
Third Respondent
Secretary of State for the Home Department
Fourth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Adoption Application / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 What is S's current nationality and what nationalities are available to her before and after adoption?
- 2 Is the adoption application a domestic adoption or an adoption with a foreign element?
- 3 Does Article 37(b) of the Vienna Convention require notification to the Indian High Commission in this case?
Ratio Decidendi
S is currently stateless as she has not acquired Indian citizenship by descent and is not a British citizen. The adoption application is a domestic adoption, not one with a foreign element, as S has always resided in the UK and was not brought into or taken out of the jurisdiction for adoption. There is no legal requirement to notify the Indian High Commission under Article 37(b) of the Vienna Convention in these circumstances, though notification may be good practice. The welfare of S is best served by making the adoption order without further delay.
Court Disposition
Adoption order granted
Orders
- S is adopted by the applicants RH and TH.
- Parental responsibility for S is vested in the adopters.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment