R v Rhys Baker & Ors
The sentences for false imprisonment were not excessive given the aggravating factors and seriousness; the discretionary driving disqualification for Jackson was appropriate, but the uplift must be reduced by the period served on remand.
- Parties
- Appellant: Rhys Baker; Appellant: Macari Jackson; Appellant: Neeko Smith; Appellant: Ronald Maketo; Respondent: Crown
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 October 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeals against sentence dismissed; Jackson's appeal against disqualification allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- False Imprisonment, Grievous Bodily Harm, Dangerous Driving, Drug Possession, Sentencing, Driving Disqualification
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rhys Baker
Appellant
Macari Jackson
Appellant
Neeko Smith
Appellant
Ronald Maketo
Appellant
Crown
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentences for false imprisonment were excessive
- 2 Whether the discretionary driving disqualification imposed on Jackson was excessive
- 3 Whether custodial sentences for Smith and Maketo should be expressed as detention in a young offender institution
Ratio Decidendi
The sentences for false imprisonment were not excessive given the aggravating factors and seriousness; the discretionary driving disqualification for Jackson was appropriate, but the uplift must be reduced by the period served on remand.
Court Disposition
Appeals against sentence dismissed; Jackson's appeal against disqualification allowed in part
Orders
- Jackson's driving disqualification uplift reduced from 70 months to 55 months
- Sentences for Smith and Maketo corrected to detention in a young offender institution
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment