R v Rhys Billy Hedges

R v Rhys Billy Hedges

The judge's directions on self-defence and manslaughter were legally correct and factually appropriate; evidential rulings on bad character and telephone calls were within discretion and not erroneous; the sentence, though severe, properly reflected the seriousness of the offence, aggravating factors, and the...

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Appellant: Rhys Billy Hedges; Respondent: Rex (The Crown)
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
29 April 2026
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Outcome
appeal against conviction dismissed; renewed application for leave to appeal against sentence refused; technical correction to sentence imposed
Legal Topics
Manslaughter, Self Defence, Bad Character Evidence, Admissibility of Evidence, Sentencing of Young Offenders
Criminal Law Manslaughter Self Defence Bad Character Evidence Admissibility of Evidence Sentencing of Young Offenders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rhys Billy Hedges

Appellant

Rex (The Crown)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge misdirected the jury on self-defence
  2. 2 Whether the trial judge failed to direct the jury on the mental element for manslaughter
  3. 3 Whether evidential rulings on bad character and telephone calls were correct

Ratio Decidendi

The judge's directions on self-defence and manslaughter were legally correct and factually appropriate; evidential rulings on bad character and telephone calls were within discretion and not erroneous; the sentence, though severe, properly reflected the seriousness of the offence, aggravating factors, and the appellant's youth; no ground of appeal was arguable or rendered the conviction unsafe.

Court Disposition

appeal against conviction dismissed; renewed application for leave to appeal against sentence refused; technical correction to sentence imposed

Orders

  • Application for extension of time to renew grounds of appeal refused
  • Appeal against conviction dismissed