Rhys Blakely v The Information Commissioner & Anor
Disclosure of the withheld information would adversely affect defence, national security and/or public safety, particularly due to the risk of a 'mosaic effect' enabling malicious actors to exploit the information. The public interest in maintaining the exception outweighs the public interest in disclosure, given the potential for extremely serious consequences and the existence of alternative mechanisms for accountability and transparency.
- Parties
- Appellant: Rhys Blakely; First Respondent: The Information Commissioner; Second Respondent: Health and Safety Executive
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 December 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Freedom of Information, Environmental Information Regulations, Public Interest Test, National Security, Public Safety, Regulatory Exemptions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rhys Blakely
Appellant
The Information Commissioner
First Respondent
Health and Safety Executive
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether disclosure of information about safety incidents at CL4 laboratories would adversely affect defence, national security or public safety under EIR regulation 12(5)(a)
- 2 Whether the public interest in maintaining the exception outweighs the public interest in disclosure
Ratio Decidendi
Disclosure of the withheld information would adversely affect defence, national security and/or public safety, particularly due to the risk of a 'mosaic effect' enabling malicious actors to exploit the information. The public interest in maintaining the exception outweighs the public interest in disclosure, given the potential for extremely serious consequences and the existence of alternative mechanisms for accountability and transparency.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment