REGINA v RHYS MORAR

REGINA v RHYS MORAR

The applicant is entitled to have 75 days counted towards his sentence for time spent on qualifying curfew under section 240A of the Criminal Justice Act 2003; the extension of time and leave to appeal are granted to this extent.

Parties
Prosecution: Regina; Applicant: Rhys Morar
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
28 January 2022
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal Sentence
Outcome
appeal allowed in part
Legal Topics
Sentence Appeal, Credit for Curfew, Extension of Time
Criminal Law Sentence Appeal Credit for Curfew Extension of Time

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Prosecution

Rhys Morar

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to credit for time spent on qualifying curfew under section 240A of the Criminal Justice Act 2003
  2. 2 Whether an extension of time for leave to appeal sentence should be granted

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant is entitled to have 75 days counted towards his sentence for time spent on qualifying curfew under section 240A of the Criminal Justice Act 2003; the extension of time and leave to appeal are granted to this extent.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed in part

Orders

  • Extension of time for leave to appeal sentence granted
  • Leave to appeal sentence granted