R v Richard Andrew Taylor
The judge erred in the structure of the sentences under section 278 of the Sentencing Act 2020; the sentence required restructuring to comply with statutory requirements without increasing the overall sentence, and the consecutive sentence for count 19 was not manifestly excessive given the guidelines.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Respondent: Rex; Applicant: Richard Andrew Taylor
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 September 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- leave to appeal against sentence granted; appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Sexual Offences, Appeals, Structure of Custodial Sentences
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Respondent
Richard Andrew Taylor
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the structure of the sentence imposed under section 278 of the Sentencing Act 2020 was correct
- 2 Whether the sentence was manifestly excessive due to consecutive sentencing
- 3 Whether sufficient account was taken of the applicant's good character
Ratio Decidendi
The judge erred in the structure of the sentences under section 278 of the Sentencing Act 2020; the sentence required restructuring to comply with statutory requirements without increasing the overall sentence, and the consecutive sentence for count 19 was not manifestly excessive given the guidelines.
Court Disposition
leave to appeal against sentence granted; appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Sentence on count 10 reduced from 11 years to 10 years; all other sentences for counts 1 to 12 concurrent with count 10, except count 6 replaced with 1-year custodial term and 1-year extended licence consecutive to count 10
- For counts 15 to 19, count 19 is lead determinate sentence of 5 years; counts 15 and 17 concurrent; counts 16 and 18 made consecutive with 4 years custodial and 1-year extended licence
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment