Secretary of State for Trade & Industry v Carr & Ors
Mr Carr engaged in deliberate and dishonest conduct over an extended period, concealing and misrepresenting the Ford claim and settlement, misleading the board, auditors, Stock Exchange, and others, and approving false accounting treatments, thereby demonstrating unfitness to be a company director under CDDA 1986.
- Parties
- Claimant: The Secretary of State for Trade and Industry; Defendant: Richard Carr
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 August 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Disqualification Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- disqualification order granted
- Legal Topics
- Director Duties, False Accounting, Disclosure Obligations, Misleading Auditors, Stock Exchange Disclosure, Disqualification Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Secretary of State for Trade and Industry
Claimant
Richard Carr
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Disqualification Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr Carr deliberately concealed the Ford claim and settlement from the board, auditors, Stock Exchange, advisers, and lenders
- 2 Whether Mr Carr was responsible for false accounting treatments in company accounts
- 3 Whether Mr Carr's conduct amounted to unfitness under Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Carr engaged in deliberate and dishonest conduct over an extended period, concealing and misrepresenting the Ford claim and settlement, misleading the board, auditors, Stock Exchange, and others, and approving false accounting treatments, thereby demonstrating unfitness to be a company director under CDDA 1986.
Court Disposition
disqualification order granted
Orders
- Mr Carr is disqualified from acting as a director for 9 ½ years
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment