Richard Dahlman v Beverly Allison Oxley & Anor
The Applicant made clear representations that costs would not be sought if the will file was provided voluntarily. The Respondents relied on these representations and complied. Despite the Respondents' unreasonable delay, the Applicant's representations preclude an award of costs. No order as to costs is made.
- Parties
- Applicant: Richard Dahlman; First Respondent: Beverly Allyson Oxley; Second Respondent: The Partners in the firm of Palmers Solicitors Kingston Upon Thames LLP
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 November 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Pre Action Disclosure / Costs Determination Following Compliance
- Outcome
- No order as to costs
- Legal Topics
- Pre Action Disclosure, Costs, Executor Conduct, Larke V Nugus Requests
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Richard Dahlman
Applicant
Beverly Allyson Oxley
First Respondent
The Partners in the firm of Palmers Solicitors Kingston Upon Thames LLP
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Pre Action Disclosure / Costs Determination Following Compliance
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether costs should be awarded for an application for pre-action disclosure
- 2 Whether executors are entitled to recover costs from the estate when acting unreasonably
Ratio Decidendi
The Applicant made clear representations that costs would not be sought if the will file was provided voluntarily. The Respondents relied on these representations and complied. Despite the Respondents' unreasonable delay, the Applicant's representations preclude an award of costs. No order as to costs is made.
Court Disposition
No order as to costs
Orders
- No costs awarded to either party
- Costs not to be paid out of the estate
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment