Avon Estates Ltd v Evans & Anor [2013] EWHC 1635 (Ch) (13 June 2013)
The boundary between Avon Park and Oxtalls Farm is the line between the centres of the hedge growers as they existed in 1955, as shown on the Ordnance Survey map and the plan attached to the 1955 conveyance. The T marks on the plan do not affect the boundary or indicate ownership in the absence of reference in the deed. The defendants have not established adverse possession of any disputed land. The claimant's road works did not cause actionable nuisance by interfering with drainage from Oxtalls Farm.
- Citation
- [2013] EWHC 1635 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Avon Estates Ltd; Defendant: Richard Evans; Defendant: Susan Evans
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 June 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Boundary Dispute and Nuisance Claim / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Claim for declaration of boundary and rejection of adverse possession and nuisance counterclaim.
- Legal Topics
- Boundary Disputes, Adverse Possession, Nuisance, Interpretation of Conveyances, Land Drainage
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Avon Estates Ltd
Claimant
Richard Evans
Defendant
Susan Evans
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Boundary Dispute and Nuisance Claim / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the correct legal boundary between Avon Park and Oxtalls Farm as established by the 1955 and 1964 conveyances?
- 2 Does the presence of T marks on the conveyance plan affect the boundary or ownership of the hedge?
- 3 Have the defendants acquired title to any disputed land by adverse possession?
Ratio Decidendi
The boundary between Avon Park and Oxtalls Farm is the line between the centres of the hedge growers as they existed in 1955, as shown on the Ordnance Survey map and the plan attached to the 1955 conveyance. The T marks on the plan do not affect the boundary or indicate ownership in the absence of reference in the deed. The defendants have not established adverse possession of any disputed land. The claimant's road works did not cause actionable nuisance by interfering with drainage from Oxtalls Farm.
Court Disposition
Claim for declaration of boundary and rejection of adverse possession and nuisance counterclaim.
Orders
- Declaration that the boundary is as found in the judgment, being the line between the centres of the hedge growers as they existed in 1955 and as modified by the 1964 conveyance.
- Defendants' claim for adverse possession is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment