Hand & Anor v George
The Human Rights Act 1998 does not generally operate retrospectively, but where the relevant event (death of Kenneth Hand) occurred after the Act came into force, the interpretation of the will must be compliant with Convention rights. The discriminatory effect of domestic adoption law is overridden by Article 14 in conjunction with Article 8, and paragraph 6 of Schedule 2 to the Adoption Act 1976 must be read down to include adopted children unless the beneficiary has availed themselves of the property right before the HRA came into force.
- Parties
- Claimant: David John Hand; Claimant: Hilary Jane Campbell; Defendant: Richard George; Defendant: Elizabeth Carolyn Stanhope
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 March 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim allowed
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of Wills, Adopted Children's Inheritance Rights, Retrospective Application of Human Rights Act, Discrimination Under Article 14 ECHR
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David John Hand
Claimant
Hilary Jane Campbell
Claimant
Richard George
Defendant
Elizabeth Carolyn Stanhope
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether adopted children are included as 'children' under a will made before adoption laws changed
- 2 Whether the Human Rights Act 1998 and European Convention on Human Rights override discriminatory domestic law in interpreting testamentary dispositions
- 3 Whether retrospective application of the Human Rights Act is permissible in this context
Ratio Decidendi
The Human Rights Act 1998 does not generally operate retrospectively, but where the relevant event (death of Kenneth Hand) occurred after the Act came into force, the interpretation of the will must be compliant with Convention rights. The discriminatory effect of domestic adoption law is overridden by Article 14 in conjunction with Article 8, and paragraph 6 of Schedule 2 to the Adoption Act 1976 must be read down to include adopted children unless the beneficiary has availed themselves of the property right before the HRA came into force.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed
Orders
- Claimants are entitled to inherit the part of their father's estate deriving from Henry Hand's will.
- Paragraph 6 of Schedule 2 to the Adoption Act 1976 is to be read down so that section 39 applies unless the beneficiary has availed themselves of the property right before the coming into force of the Human Rights Act 1998.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment