Nageh v Giddings & Anor [2006] EWHC 3240 (TCC) (08 December 2006)

Nageh v Giddings & Anor [2006] EWHC 3240 (TCC) (08 December 2006)

The application to set aside summary judgment was refused because it was not made promptly, there was no good explanation for the delay or non-attendance, and service of documents was properly effected in accordance with the Civil Procedure Rules. Even if set aside, the adjudicator's decision would have been enforced anew.

Citation
[2006] EWHC 3240 (TCC)
Parties
Claimant: Nageh; Defendant: Richard Giddings; Defendant: Another (Second Defendant, former wife of Richard Giddings)
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
08 December 2006
Procedural Posture
Application to Set Aside Summary Judgment / Post Judgment, Application to Set Aside Summary Judgment
Outcome
Application dismissed; summary judgment order remains in force.
Legal Topics
Summary Judgment, Service of Documents, Adjudication Enforcement, Relief From Sanctions
Civil Procedure Construction Law Summary Judgment Service of Documents Adjudication Enforcement Relief From Sanctions

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Nageh

Claimant

Richard Giddings

Defendant

Another (Second Defendant, former wife of Richard Giddings)

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Application to Set Aside Summary Judgment / Post Judgment, Application to Set Aside Summary Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the application to set aside summary judgment was made promptly
  2. 2 Whether there was a good explanation for the defendants' non-attendance at the summary judgment hearing
  3. 3 Whether service of court and adjudication documents was properly effected in accordance with CPR 6.5(6)

Ratio Decidendi

The application to set aside summary judgment was refused because it was not made promptly, there was no good explanation for the delay or non-attendance, and service of documents was properly effected in accordance with the Civil Procedure Rules. Even if set aside, the adjudicator's decision would have been enforced anew.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed; summary judgment order remains in force.

Orders

  • Defendants' application to set aside summary judgment is dismissed.
  • Order for summary judgment dated 11 March 2005 remains in force.