R v Richard Hunter-Smith

R v Richard Hunter-Smith

The sentences imposed, including the uplift for aggravating features and the reductions for totality and guilty plea, were justified and proportionate to the overall criminality. The principle of totality was properly applied. There was no basis to interfere with the sentences imposed.

Parties
Prosecutor: Rex; Appellant: Richard Hunter-Smith
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
23 November 2022
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Aggravated Burglary, Grievous Bodily Harm, Use of Weapons, Totality Principle
Criminal Law Sentencing Aggravated Burglary Grievous Bodily Harm Use of Weapons Totality Principle

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecutor

Richard Hunter-Smith

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentence for section 18 grievous bodily harm was manifestly excessive
  2. 2 Whether the total sentence failed to reflect the principle of totality

Ratio Decidendi

The sentences imposed, including the uplift for aggravating features and the reductions for totality and guilty plea, were justified and proportionate to the overall criminality. The principle of totality was properly applied. There was no basis to interfere with the sentences imposed.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Sentence of 21 years' imprisonment upheld
  • Driving disqualification for 16 years and until extended retest is passed upheld