Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy v Adam & Ors [2021] EWHC 3894 (Ch) (26 November 2021)
Mr Whitaker's report, as it stands, is not CPR 35 compliant and strays outside the role of an independent expert by engaging in fact-finding and expressing views on factual matters reserved for the court. The Secretary of State must clarify which parts of the report require response from defendants to ensure fair...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] EWHC 3894 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: The Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy; Defendant: Richard John Adam; Defendant: Richard John Howson; Defendant: Zafar Iqbal Khan; Defendant: Keith Robertson Cochrane CBE; Defendant: Andrew James Harrower Dougal; Defendant: Philip Nevill Green CBE; Defendant: Alison Jane Horner; Defendant: Ceri Michelle Powell
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 November 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Directors Disqualification Proceedings / Directions Hearing Regarding Expert Evidence
- Outcome
- Application withdrawn; court requires clarification from the Secretary of State regarding the Whitaker report.
- Legal Topics
- Directors' Disqualification, Expert Evidence, False Accounting, Case Management
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
Claimant
Richard John Adam
Defendant
Richard John Howson
Defendant
Zafar Iqbal Khan
Defendant
Keith Robertson Cochrane CBE
Defendant
Andrew James Harrower Dougal
Defendant
Philip Nevill Green CBE
Defendant
Alison Jane Horner
Defendant
Ceri Michelle Powell
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Directors Disqualification Proceedings / Directions Hearing Regarding Expert Evidence
Legal Issues
- 1 Admissibility and scope of expert evidence under CPR Part 35
- 2 Appropriateness of Mr Whitaker's expert report
- 3 Guidance for the instruction of experts in civil claims
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Whitaker's report, as it stands, is not CPR 35 compliant and strays outside the role of an independent expert by engaging in fact-finding and expressing views on factual matters reserved for the court. The Secretary of State must clarify which parts of the report require response from defendants to ensure fair case management.
Court Disposition
Application withdrawn; court requires clarification from the Secretary of State regarding the Whitaker report.
Orders
- The Secretary of State must inform the defendants, by a date to be determined, which parts of the Whitaker report (if any) he considers must be answered by them in producing their evidence.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment