Richard Lee Norris v R
The minimum term of 27 years imposed was not manifestly excessive, as the combination of aggravating factors justified an uplift from the statutory starting point, and the mitigating factors were insubstantial.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Richard Lee Norris; Respondent: R
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Murder, Aggravating and Mitigating Factors
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Richard Lee Norris
Appellant
R
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether aggravating factors relied upon by the sentencing judge were substantial enough to justify an uplift from the statutory starting point for minimum term in murder sentencing
- 2 Whether mitigating factors were properly weighed
Ratio Decidendi
The minimum term of 27 years imposed was not manifestly excessive, as the combination of aggravating factors justified an uplift from the statutory starting point, and the mitigating factors were insubstantial.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Minimum term of 27 years imprisonment upheld
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment