Lloyds TSB Bank Plc v McColl & Anor [2001] EWCA Civ 465 (13 February 2001)

Lloyds TSB Bank Plc v McColl & Anor [2001] EWCA Civ 465 (13 February 2001)

There was no important point of principle or practice or other compelling reason to grant permission to appeal; the county court judge acted fairly and with appropriate consideration for the litigant in person.

Citation
[2001] EWCA Civ 465
Parties
Claimant: Lloyds TSB Bank PLC; Defendant/applicant: Mrs Anne McColl; Defendant: Richard Michael Griffith
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
13 February 2001
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal to Court of Appeal
Outcome
application for permission to appeal refused
Legal Topics
Appeals, Charging Orders, Default Judgment, Litigant in Person, Human Rights Act 1998, Access to Justice Act 1999
Civil Procedure Banking Law Human Rights Appeals Charging Orders Default Judgment Litigant in Person Human Rights Act 1998 +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Lloyds TSB Bank PLC

Claimant

Mrs Anne McColl

Defendant/applicant

Richard Michael Griffith

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal to Court of Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Mrs McColl received a fair trial in the county court
  2. 2 Whether permission to appeal should be granted under section 55 of the Access to Justice Act 1999
  3. 3 Whether Human Rights Act 1998 Articles 6 and 8 were breached

Ratio Decidendi

There was no important point of principle or practice or other compelling reason to grant permission to appeal; the county court judge acted fairly and with appropriate consideration for the litigant in person.

Court Disposition

application for permission to appeal refused

Orders

  • application dismissed