Ali, R. v [2024] EWHC 1699 (SCCO) (01 July 2024)
Where the prosecution relies on extracts from categories of electronic data, all such data in those categories should be included in the PPE count. The correct methodology for spreadsheet-based electronic evidence is to remove blank columns, use print preview, and count full pages, aiming for a sensible approximation rather than an inflated or artificially reduced count.
- Citation
- [2024] EWHC 1699 (SCCO)
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Defendant: Rimon Ali
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 July 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Costs Appeal (criminal Legal Aid) / Judgment on Appeal Under Regulation 29 of the Criminal Legal Aid (remuneration) Regulations 2013
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Litigators' Graduated Fee Scheme, Pages of Prosecution Evidence (ppe), Electronic Evidence, Remuneration of Defence Solicitors
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
Rimon Ali
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Costs Appeal (criminal Legal Aid) / Judgment on Appeal Under Regulation 29 of the Criminal Legal Aid (remuneration) Regulations 2013
Legal Issues
- 1 What categories of electronic data should be included in the PPE count for the purposes of the Litigators' Graduated Fee Scheme?
- 2 What is the correct methodology for deriving a PPE page count from electronic evidence served in spreadsheet format?
Ratio Decidendi
Where the prosecution relies on extracts from categories of electronic data, all such data in those categories should be included in the PPE count. The correct methodology for spreadsheet-based electronic evidence is to remove blank columns, use print preview, and count full pages, aiming for a sensible approximation rather than an inflated or artificially reduced count.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part
Orders
- The appropriate additional payment is to be made to the Applicant based on a total PPE count of 2,023 pages.
- The Appellant is awarded £750 (exclusive of VAT) for costs and the £100 paid on appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment