Meadow Designs Ltd & Ors v Rishco Leisure Ltd & Anor [2022] EWHC 2211 (Ch) (22 August 2022)
The Court found that while the Claimants breached their duties of full and frank disclosure and failed to comply with undertakings as to service, it would be disproportionate to discharge the injunction entirely. The injunction was varied to reduce its scope, reflecting the breaches and the current circumstances. Ancillary orders were made for appointment of Accura as joint auditor of RLL and provision of limited further information, but not for appointment of a director to other companies. The costs order from 13 May 2022 was discharged, with costs to be addressed at a consequentials hearing.
- Citation
- [2022] EWHC 2211 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Meadow Designs Limited; Claimant: Rainmead Ltd.; Claimant: Tiderealm Ltd; Claimant: Templebarn Ltd; Claimant: Julian Lewis Tendler; Defendant: Rishco Leisure Limited; Defendant: Jason Marc Rishover
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 August 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Applications in Civil Proceedings (injunctions) / Post Injunction, Hearing of Applications to Discharge or Vary Interim Injunction
- Outcome
- Injunction varied and continued in reduced scope; ancillary orders granted in part; costs order discharged.
- Legal Topics
- Interim Injunctions, Joint Venture Disputes, Shareholder Rights, Breach of Contract, Duties of Full and Frank Disclosure, Costs Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Meadow Designs Limited
Claimant
Rainmead Ltd.
Claimant
Tiderealm Ltd
Claimant
Templebarn Ltd
Claimant
Julian Lewis Tendler
Claimant
Rishco Leisure Limited
Defendant
Jason Marc Rishover
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Applications in Civil Proceedings (injunctions) / Post Injunction, Hearing of Applications to Discharge or Vary Interim Injunction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the interim injunction granted on 13 May 2022 should be discharged or varied
- 2 Whether the Claimants failed in their duty of full and frank disclosure
- 3 Whether the Claimants breached undertakings to the Court regarding service
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that while the Claimants breached their duties of full and frank disclosure and failed to comply with undertakings as to service, it would be disproportionate to discharge the injunction entirely. The injunction was varied to reduce its scope, reflecting the breaches and the current circumstances. Ancillary orders were made for appointment of Accura as joint auditor of RLL and provision of limited further information, but not for appointment of a director to other companies. The costs order from 13 May 2022 was discharged, with costs to be addressed at a consequentials hearing.
Court Disposition
Injunction varied and continued in reduced scope; ancillary orders granted in part; costs order discharged.
Orders
- Injunction order amended to reduce its scope
- No order appointing Mr Ingrao as director of companies other than RLL
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment