Sky UK Limited & Anor v Riverstone Managing Agency Limited & Ors
Sky is entitled to indemnity for physical damage to roof cassettes occurring during the policy period, subject to a single deductible of £150,000, as the failure to specify temporary roofing was a single event. Mace is only insured for damage occurring before practical completion. Recoverable costs include the reasonable cost of temporary roofing, crash decks, decanting, and out-of-hours working, but only to the extent necessary to repair damage as at the end of the policy period. The quantum is to be determined by reference to the 2018-9 scheme, adjusted for reasonable temporary works and associated costs.
- Parties
- Claimant (705 Claim): Sky UK Limited; Claimant (536 Claim): Mace Limited; Defendant: Riverstone Managing Agency Limited; Defendant: The Underwriting Members of Lloyd’s Syndicate 3210 for the 2014 Year of Account Subscribing to Policy B0509DD190814; Defendant: Old Company 18 Limited; Defendant: Aspen Insurance UK Limited; Defendant: Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance PLC; Defendant: HSB Engineering Insurance Limited; Defendant: Berkshire Hathaway International Insurance Limited; Defendant: MSI Corporate Capital Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 September 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Insurance Dispute (construction All Risks) / Final Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Claim allowed in part for Sky; Mace's claim limited to pre-practical completion damage; quantum to be determined.
- Legal Topics
- Construction All Risks Policy, Design Defect Exclusions (de5), Policy Interpretation, Aggregation of Losses, Quantum of Indemnity, Third Party Insureds, Temporary Works, Consequential Loss Exclusion
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sky UK Limited
Claimant (705 Claim)
Mace Limited
Claimant (536 Claim)
Riverstone Managing Agency Limited
Defendant
The Underwriting Members of Lloyd’s Syndicate 3210 for the 2014 Year of Account Subscribing to Policy B0509DD190814
Defendant
Old Company 18 Limited
Defendant
Aspen Insurance UK Limited
Defendant
Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance PLC
Defendant
HSB Engineering Insurance Limited
Defendant
Berkshire Hathaway International Insurance Limited
Defendant
MSI Corporate Capital Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Insurance Dispute (construction All Risks) / Final Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Sky and Mace are entitled to indemnity under the construction all risks policy for damage to the Sky Central roof
- 2 Whether Mace is insured under the policy post-practical completion
- 3 Proper construction of 'physical damage' and 'event' under the policy
Ratio Decidendi
Sky is entitled to indemnity for physical damage to roof cassettes occurring during the policy period, subject to a single deductible of £150,000, as the failure to specify temporary roofing was a single event. Mace is only insured for damage occurring before practical completion. Recoverable costs include the reasonable cost of temporary roofing, crash decks, decanting, and out-of-hours working, but only to the extent necessary to repair damage as at the end of the policy period. The quantum is to be determined by reference to the 2018-9 scheme, adjusted for reasonable temporary works and associated costs.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed in part for Sky; Mace's claim limited to pre-practical completion damage; quantum to be determined.
Orders
- Defendants to indemnify Sky for physical damage to roof cassettes occurring during the policy period, subject to a single £150,000 deductible.
- Quantum to be calculated by reference to the 2018-9 remedial scheme, with reasonable costs for temporary roof (as per revised Sky scheme), crash decks (as per Mace scheme), decanting, and out-of-hours working included.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment