Business Mortgage Finance 4 Plc & Ors v Hussain & Ors
The defendants were never validly appointed as directors, trustees, or officers of the Issuers; all steps taken by them in those capacities, including filings at Companies House, share forfeitures, and appointments, were invalid and of no effect. The court granted rectification of the company and PSC registers, declarations confirming the true directors, trustees, and shareholders, and wide-ranging final injunctions restraining the defendants from further interference, holding out, or making unauthorised filings or announcements.
- Parties
- Claimant: Business Mortgage Finance 4 PLC; Claimant: Business Mortgage Finance 5 PLC; Claimant: Business Mortgage Finance 6 PLC; Claimant: Business Mortgage Finance 7 PLC; Claimant: BMF Holdings Limited; Defendant: Rizwan Hussain; Defendant: Alfred Olutayo Oyekoya; Defendant: Rajnish Kalia; Defendant: Elizabeth Kirby; Defendant: Jai Singh; Defendant: Mohammed Osman; Defendant: Callon Shared Equity Limited; Defendant: Callon Capital Management Limited; Defendant: Highbury Investments Limited; Defendant: Registrar of Companies; Defendant: Governor of Her Majesty’s Prison Wandsworth
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 February 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Final Judgment
- Legal Topics
- Rectification of Company Register, Injunctions, Directors' Appointment and Removal, Corporate Governance, Fraudulent Filings, Shareholder Rights, Trustee Appointment, Contempt of Court
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Business Mortgage Finance 4 PLC
Claimant
Business Mortgage Finance 5 PLC
Claimant
Business Mortgage Finance 6 PLC
Claimant
Business Mortgage Finance 7 PLC
Claimant
BMF Holdings Limited
Claimant
Rizwan Hussain
Defendant
Alfred Olutayo Oyekoya
Defendant
Rajnish Kalia
Defendant
Elizabeth Kirby
Defendant
Jai Singh
Defendant
Mohammed Osman
Defendant
Callon Shared Equity Limited
Defendant
Callon Capital Management Limited
Defendant
Highbury Investments Limited
Defendant
Registrar of Companies
Defendant
Governor of Her Majesty’s Prison Wandsworth
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Were the defendants validly appointed as directors of the Issuers?
- 2 Were the defendants entitled to make filings at Companies House?
- 3 Were the defendants entitled to act as trustees, receivers, or other officers of the Issuers?
Ratio Decidendi
The defendants were never validly appointed as directors, trustees, or officers of the Issuers; all steps taken by them in those capacities, including filings at Companies House, share forfeitures, and appointments, were invalid and of no effect. The court granted rectification of the company and PSC registers, declarations confirming the true directors, trustees, and shareholders, and wide-ranging final injunctions restraining the defendants from further interference, holding out, or making unauthorised filings or announcements.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment