RN v TT
The husband's claim is limited by the long delay in bringing proceedings, his lack of contribution, and the fact that his needs are not relationship-generated. The fair outcome is a lump sum of £35,000 and a 100% pension sharing order of the Aviva pension, with a clean break otherwise. The husband's claims to post-separation accruals and further capital are rejected.
- Parties
- Applicant: RN; Respondent: TT
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 September 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Financial Remedies After Divorce / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Lump sum and pension sharing order in favour of husband; clean break; no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- Financial Remedies, Delay in Financial Claims, Pension Sharing, Clean Break, Needs Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
RN
Applicant
TT
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Financial Remedies After Divorce / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Entitlement to financial remedies after long delay post-separation
- 2 Extent of sharing of assets and pensions accrued before, during, and after marriage
- 3 Assessment of needs and contributions
Ratio Decidendi
The husband's claim is limited by the long delay in bringing proceedings, his lack of contribution, and the fact that his needs are not relationship-generated. The fair outcome is a lump sum of £35,000 and a 100% pension sharing order of the Aviva pension, with a clean break otherwise. The husband's claims to post-separation accruals and further capital are rejected.
Court Disposition
Lump sum and pension sharing order in favour of husband; clean break; no order as to costs.
Orders
- Wife to pay lump sum of £35,000 to husband within 28 days.
- Pension sharing order: 100% of Aviva pension to husband.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment