Nevers, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 1363 (22 April 2010)
There were no arguable grounds to challenge the conviction; the trial judge's directions and evidentiary rulings were correct. However, the sentence of life imprisonment was excessive given the circumstances and legal principles; imprisonment for public protection with a minimum term was appropriate.
- Citation
- [2010] EWCA Crim 1363
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Applicant/appellant/defendant: Kevin Anthony Nevers
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 April 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal against conviction refused; appeal against sentence allowed.
- Legal Topics
- Robbery, Identification Evidence, Dangerous Offender, Sentencing, Imprisonment for Public Protection, Life Imprisonment, Appeal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Kevin Anthony Nevers
Applicant/appellant/defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 admissibility and use of qualified identification evidence
- 2 judicial discretion regarding jury discharge after defendant's outburst
- 3 disclosure of alleged informant's antecedents
Ratio Decidendi
There were no arguable grounds to challenge the conviction; the trial judge's directions and evidentiary rulings were correct. However, the sentence of life imprisonment was excessive given the circumstances and legal principles; imprisonment for public protection with a minimum term was appropriate.
Court Disposition
Appeal against conviction refused; appeal against sentence allowed.
Orders
- Sentences of life imprisonment quashed.
- Sentences of imprisonment for public protection imposed on each count.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment