Haddon, R v
Had the jury been presented with the new psychiatric evidence, they would likely have found the appellant guilty of manslaughter by reason of diminished responsibility rather than murder; thus, the murder conviction is quashed and a verdict of manslaughter is entered.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Regina; Appellant: Robert Allan Haddon
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 January 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Reference by Criminal Cases Review Commission; Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- murder conviction quashed; verdict of manslaughter by diminished responsibility entered; sentence adjourned
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Manslaughter, Diminished Responsibility, Personality Disorder, Psychiatric Evidence, Criminal Appeal Act 1995, Mental Health Act 1983
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecutor
Robert Allan Haddon
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Reference by Criminal Cases Review Commission; Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether new psychiatric evidence establishes diminished responsibility at the time of the offence
- 2 Whether the conviction for murder should be quashed and substituted with manslaughter
Ratio Decidendi
Had the jury been presented with the new psychiatric evidence, they would likely have found the appellant guilty of manslaughter by reason of diminished responsibility rather than murder; thus, the murder conviction is quashed and a verdict of manslaughter is entered.
Court Disposition
murder conviction quashed; verdict of manslaughter by diminished responsibility entered; sentence adjourned
Orders
- Murder conviction quashed
- Verdict of manslaughter by diminished responsibility entered
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment