Robert Bartosik v The Information Commissioner
The Tribunal has no jurisdiction to review the merits of the Commissioner's decision; the Commissioner took appropriate procedural steps and informed the Applicant of the outcome. The application is an attempt to challenge the substantive outcome, not a procedural failure, and has no reasonable prospect of success.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: Robert Bartosik; Respondent: The Information Commissioner
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Section 166 Data Protection Act 1998 / Strike Out Application
- Outcome
- Application struck out
- Legal Topics
- Section 166 DPA 1998, Procedural Remedies, Regulatory Action, Tribunal Jurisdiction
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robert Bartosik
Applicant
The Information Commissioner
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application Under Section 166 Data Protection Act 1998 / Strike Out Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Information Commissioner failed in a procedural respect under section 166 DPA 1998
- 2 Whether the Tribunal can review the merits of the Commissioner's decision
- 3 Whether the Commissioner took appropriate steps to investigate the complaint
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal has no jurisdiction to review the merits of the Commissioner's decision; the Commissioner took appropriate procedural steps and informed the Applicant of the outcome. The application is an attempt to challenge the substantive outcome, not a procedural failure, and has no reasonable prospect of success.
Court Disposition
Application struck out
Orders
- The application under section 166 of the Data Protection Act 1998 is struck out under rule 8(3)(c) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment