Brown, R. v
The sentence imposed was not excessive, given the substantial level of culpability remaining despite diminished responsibility, and properly accounted for aggravating features including planning, proximity of children, and concealment of the body. The judge's approach was consistent with the jury's verdict and...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Robert Brown; Respondent: R (The Crown)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 December 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Manslaughter, Diminished Responsibility, Sentencing, Obstruction of Coroner
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robert Brown
Appellant
R (The Crown)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence for manslaughter on grounds of diminished responsibility was excessive and consistent with the jury's verdict
- 2 Appropriate correlation between sentences for murder and manslaughter
- 3 Interpretation of 'substantially impaired' under section 52 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence imposed was not excessive, given the substantial level of culpability remaining despite diminished responsibility, and properly accounted for aggravating features including planning, proximity of children, and concealment of the body. The judge's approach was consistent with the jury's verdict and established legal principles.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- sentence of 24 years imprisonment for manslaughter upheld
- sentence of 2 years imprisonment for obstruction of coroner upheld
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment