Brown, R. v

Brown, R. v

The sentence imposed was not excessive, given the substantial level of culpability remaining despite diminished responsibility, and properly accounted for aggravating features including planning, proximity of children, and concealment of the body. The judge's approach was consistent with the jury's verdict and...

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Appellant: Robert Brown; Respondent: R (The Crown)
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
01 December 2011
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Manslaughter, Diminished Responsibility, Sentencing, Obstruction of Coroner
Criminal Law Manslaughter Diminished Responsibility Sentencing Obstruction of Coroner

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Robert Brown

Appellant

R (The Crown)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence

  1. 1 Whether the sentence for manslaughter on grounds of diminished responsibility was excessive and consistent with the jury's verdict
  2. 2 Appropriate correlation between sentences for murder and manslaughter
  3. 3 Interpretation of 'substantially impaired' under section 52 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009

Ratio Decidendi

The sentence imposed was not excessive, given the substantial level of culpability remaining despite diminished responsibility, and properly accounted for aggravating features including planning, proximity of children, and concealment of the body. The judge's approach was consistent with the jury's verdict and established legal principles.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • sentence of 24 years imprisonment for manslaughter upheld
  • sentence of 2 years imprisonment for obstruction of coroner upheld