Cooksley & Anor v R

Cooksley & Anor v R

Fresh sentencing guidelines are issued for causing death by dangerous driving and careless driving under the influence, with four starting points based on culpability and aggravating factors. Sentences must reflect both the offender's culpability and the outcome, but custody is generally required unless exceptional mitigation exists. Disqualification periods must be proportionate to risk and culpability. Individual appeals are determined by applying these principles to the facts.

Parties
Appellant: Robert Charles Cooksley; Appellant: Ian Paul Stride; Appellant: Neil Terence John Cook; Appellant: Richard James Crump; Respondent: Regina
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
03 April 2003
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
Appeals of Cooksley dismissed; Stride and Cook allowed in part; Attorney General's Reference for Crump allowed in part.
Legal Topics
Causing Death by Dangerous Driving, Careless Driving Under Influence, Sentencing Guidelines, Aggravating and Mitigating Factors, Disqualification

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 23 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 12
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Robert Charles Cooksley

Appellant

Ian Paul Stride

Appellant

Neil Terence John Cook

Appellant

Richard James Crump

Appellant

Regina

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment

  1. 1 Should fresh sentencing guidelines be issued for causing death by dangerous driving and careless driving under the influence?
  2. 2 What aggravating and mitigating factors are relevant in sentencing for these offences?
  3. 3 How should the offender's culpability and the outcome of the offence be balanced in sentencing?

Ratio Decidendi

Fresh sentencing guidelines are issued for causing death by dangerous driving and careless driving under the influence, with four starting points based on culpability and aggravating factors. Sentences must reflect both the offender's culpability and the outcome, but custody is generally required unless exceptional mitigation exists. Disqualification periods must be proportionate to risk and culpability. Individual appeals are determined by applying these principles to the facts.

Court Disposition

Appeals of Cooksley dismissed; Stride and Cook allowed in part; Attorney General's Reference for Crump allowed in part.

Orders

  • Cooksley: sentence of 4 years imprisonment and 6 years disqualification upheld.
  • Stride: sentence reduced to 18 months imprisonment and disqualification reduced to 3 years.